Last week I attended my first London On Board event, a regular meetup for board game fans. I wanted to go along for a few reasons...

Firstly, I've I spend a lot of time in virtual communities (it's my job), and diving into a real world one is just good for the soul. Over the past few years I've played everything from poker to Call of Cthulhu in an assortment of pubs across London and every time I've come away feeling far less cynical and introverted than I did when I went in.

There is something about these kinds of get-togethers that always restores my faith in humanity a little bit. Maybe I shouldn't be amazed that I can walk into a pub, buy a drink, wander over to a table and expect some people I've never met before to patiently explain rules and etiquette to me before we sit down to play. But I am quietly amazed every single time.

I think there's something about the mix of people at these types of events that really appeals to me as well. They're a real antidote to the reinforcement theory, and if you work in a fairly static office environment five days out of every week then I think it's just good for your basic mental health to throw yourself into a totally alien and random mix of people every now and again.

Before this post gets too up its own arse, I should mention that I played the game Seven Wonders on my first trip to London On Board, and really enjoyed it (dodgy iPhone pic of the setup above). Like a lot of these 'designer' board games it took a while to explain the rules and mechanics but once we got going the patterns and flow of the game became immediately apparent and after two games I was itching to play more in order to fine tune my understanding of the various strategies. My only quibble would be that the Seven Wonders seems to be a very rapid game (when not played with complete noobs like me) and the pace of the decision making seemed to clash with the need to keep a track of what everyone else was doing. Maybe the ability to keep up and play strategically comes with experience.

By the way, the video at the top of the post is completely unrelated to London on Board, but was just something I stumbled on a few days afterwards and thought it was worth sharing.

Posted
AuthorRob Hinchcliffe
A few weeks Jonathan Kahn of Lucid Plot and Confab London, London Content Strategy Meetup, Dare conference and countless other interesting things, interviewed me for his podcast.

Over the course of about 40 minutes I say things like, "Can you not just show the social media lovely unicorn dreams section." and... "It was next to my face. That doesn’t mean I wrote it." But I also say (I think) some stuff that you might find interesting and useful.

You can listen to it here.

Posted
AuthorRob Hinchcliffe
Categorieswork

This article was written for my friend Katie's site Dork Adore ('Lovely things for geeks'). The original is here.

After five seasons, sci-fi drama Fringe has come to an end. I’m writing this before watching the double-episode finale so I can get my thoughts down without them being tainted by the murky filter of ‘how it ended’.

I have been banging on about how Fringe is a genuinely entertaining, intelligent and downright fun slab of TV goodness for years now, but I’ve never committed to explaining exactly why I thought that (other than the slightly unconvincing “because it just is!”). So here’s my personal ten reasons why I love it so much.

If you’re a fan of the show I hope you find something in here to agree with, and if you haven’t seen it yet (fair warning: this article contains a few, minor spoilers) then I hope this might persuade you to go pick up a DVD or two. I promise you won’t be disappointed.

1) Fantastic monsters-of-the-week: It’s far too common for series which have to produce a fresh set of freaks and boogy men each week to find themselves scraping the bottom of the barrel before the end of the first season.

But Fringe set the bar early on with giant mutant porcupines, and them moved on to genetically enhanced griffins and a lizard-wasp-bat hybrid. And they didn’t stop at CGI beasties, Fringe has always had a strong, character-led mystery/horror element to it and has managed to serve up a menagerie of supercharged serial killers, multi-dimensional shapeshifters, suspected spontaneous combustions, and telekinetic kids to keep the Fringe team busy over the years.

I have too many favourites to mention but the synopsis of Episode 11 of Series two should give you a good idea of the sheer brilliance of the show’s oddball themes:

“A teenage girl awakens after an incident leaves her brain-dead… but she now starts reciting submarine launch codes in Russian.”

If you dont’ want to go and watch that episode right away then you’re dead inside.

2) 3) and 4) – Anna Torv, Pacey and John Noble: Okay, I’m cheating a bit here by treating ‘the cast’ as three separate reasons for greatness, but honestly they all play an equally important role in making Fringe the show it is, and together they definitely create something greater than the sum of their parts .

It’s impossible to think of him as anything other than Pacey Lots of Fringe viewers were a little unsure about Anna Torv to begin with. The pilot episode didn’t do her many favours by putting her in a slightly sappy relationship with a fellow FBI agent, and the character of Olivia Dunham was a tad frosty and insular, so warming to her was always going to be a slow burn. But thankfully the producers didn’t attempt to short cut the process by forcing Torv to run around in her pants, machine-gunning down aliens while cracking one-liners; instead they let Torv slowly bring the character to life and by the end of season one she had us all wrapped around her little finger.

By ‘Pacey’ of course I mean Joshua Jackson. But as someone who went to university in the late 90s, it’s almost impossible for me to think of him as anything other than Pacey.

Maybe Jackson’s biggest success is that no one watches Fringe and expects James Van Der Beek to stroll on and start sobbing about his love for Joey. Despite playing what is arguably the least interesting of the three leads in Fringe, Jackson pulls off conflicted, moody and smart without ever descending into maudlin and cocky; and his on-screen relationship with John Noble is one of the best father-son TV double acts in recent memory.

Speaking of John Noble… what a brilliant character actor this man is. You might know him as Denethor in Lord of the Rings, or ‘that Russian bloke’ in Season six of 24; but it is Fringe that has given him the room to display his brilliance with one of the best Mad Scientist’ parts ever written for the screen.

The ‘dotty older guy who is brilliant but unreliable and sometimes just plain weird’ is a staple of SF telly; but it’s bloody hard to get right. I remember forcing myself to watch three episodes of Warehouse 13, and watching the usually brilliant Saul Rubinek struggle with a similar role. I just wanted to slap him after the first ten minutes.

But Walter Bishop is a far more complex and intriguing character than most. His foibles, his fragility, his addiction to pharmaceuticals and confectionary, his occasional nudity, his love of music, and every other subtle fragment of his personality built up over the years by Noble himself alongside the show’s writer, has created a truly unique and memorable TV character. I desperately want someone to create a set of Walter Bishop action figures so I can collect them all. That’s how good he is.

5) ‘Over There’ – At the end of Season One Fringe introduced its alternate universe, a slightly tweaked version of our world with more zeppelins, less coffee and a different coloured Statue of Liberty. It also played home to alternate versions of the Fringe team, including the undoubtedly saner, but also ruthless and cruel ‘Walternate’; and the more playful, relaxed and generally more kick-ass ‘Fauxlivia’. The latter lets Anna Torv have a bit of fun while showing just how versatile an actress she is, while the former creates a whole new dramatic centre for the series and leads to some truly gripping story lines that gave Fringe some serious momentum for the next four series.

6) The ‘weird’ 19th episodes – Towards the end of each series the writers of Fringe let themselves go a little bit nuts and produce their equivalent of The Simpon’s ‘Treehouse of Horror’ episodes.

They’ve produced ‘Brown Betty’ a fanciful slice of noir detective fiction with a sprinkling of musical theatre; the amazing ‘Lysergic Acid Diethylamide’ in which Leonard Nimoy inhabited Anna Torv’s body and most of the action happened in cartoon form; the slightly-less-bonkers but intriguing ‘Letters in Transit’ set in 2036; and the ninth episode of the most recent season (not the 19th as it’s only 12 episodes long) , which featured a fantastic Gilliam-esque animated sequence triggered by Walter’s extended use of hallucinogenics.

These episodes release a bit of tension, allow the writers to experiment, and lets the main story arc take a break, meaning there’s less need for any of that nasty narrative padding that afflicts so many US series that have to produce 20-odd episodes per season.

Plus they’re also just fun.

7) Leonard F’ing Nimoy. Yes, Doctor Spock is in Fringe… a bit. Introduced in season two, Nimoy plays Doctor William Bell, Walter’s former lab partner and founder of the best-named company in the history of companies: Massive Dynamic.

It’s a cracking role and Nimoy played it note-perfect. The only shame is Nimoy only appeared in a handful of episodes. But, as they say on Vulcan: a handful of Spock is better than no Spock at all.

8) A will-they-won’t-they storyline that didn’t suck: Fringe fans always knew Olivia and Peter would end up in bed together, we just prayed that it wouldn’t ruin the show’s dynamic. It’s happened so many times before, from Moonlighting, to Cheers, to Fringe’s closest relative The X-Files, that it was hard not to dread the moment the unresolved sexual tension resolved itself.

But Fringe handled it as deftly as they handled most of the emotional threads within the show: hold the cheese, go easy on the sweetener, and make damn sure that whatever happened it propelled the story forward.

9) Its themes: Fringe has never been afraid to tackle themes that might seem a little out of its ‘Weekly SF show with a couple of monsters and some pretty stars’ league.

The wonders of technology and science, and the arrogance of those who wield their powers has featured heavily from series one; as has the idea that our reality is far more fragile that we might think. That ties in with the show’s fascination with questions of identity, personality and memory, questions that the show might have asked in a slightly messy and woolly way at times, but at least it asked them.

And then of course there are its insistences on the persistence of hope and humanity and our ability to effect what awaits us. When you write that down it may sound trite, cheesy even. But when you wrap them all up in stories that also involve giant mutant porcupines, then you get something pretty special.

10) Everything doesn’t rest on the ending: J.J. Abrams is co-creator, writer, and executive producer on Fringe, he also had a bit of a hand in that other TV series, Lost. Now I’m not going to delve into a big ‘Lost versus Fringe’ argument now (mainly because they are two quite different entities), but I will say that Fringe has done itself no end of favours by ensuring that the show’s integrity doesn’t rest on what happens in those final two episodes.

Of course I’ll be holding my breath, hoping it wraps things up in a smart, funny, dramatic and ultimately satisfying way. We want that from all the TV we invest ourselves in.

But, like I said, I’m writing this before watching the culmination, and I know that whatever happens I will still love this show, because it’s already proven itself to me as a consistently entertaining, fun, witty and interesting show that succeeded in its ambitions more than it failed, and which gave me a seriously enjoyable hour of ‘other-worldliness’ in my week.

Posted
AuthorRob Hinchcliffe

This is an article I wrote for Marketing Magazine at the beginning of 2013.

Last week the way television works changed dramatically, and it’s all thanks to a DVD rental company (clue: it’s not Blockbuster).

Netflix used to deliver your DVDs by mail. After a few years they made the predictable shift to a digital distribution model. But few people foresaw that they would follow networks like HBO and AMC and move into creating what the Americans love to call ‘original programming’.

But they have, and they haven’t gone about it half-cocked either. Instead they’ve spent $100m on an ultra-glossy, David-Fincher-produced, Kevin-Spacey-starring, political drama based on the classic UK series, House of Cards.

House of Cards began on Friday, and it ends whenever you want it to. Because Netflix are letting you stream all 13 episodes of the series straight away, if you really want to spend an entire day pigging out on some Machiavellian, Whitehouse-based wickedness.

It’s tempting, when faced with this kind of seismic shift, to focus on the negatives and begin lamenting the loss of everything we once held dear: predictability, schedules, mass-participation… our jobs. But take even a brief glance at the column marked ‘positives’ and things start looking up. Here are four examples to get things started:

1. The schedule hasn’t disappeared, it’s waiting to be made

Let’s face it, schedules sucked anyway. Seemingly arbitrary, prone to last-minute changes, and increasingly redundant in this era of catch-up and timeshifting, even the concept of ‘the watershed’ seems like a laughable relic of a less enlightened time. But now we don’t have the broadcasters enforcing their schedules on us, it frees us up to create our own.

So who will be the new curators of sequential television? People still crave that collective experience, they just don’t want it forced on them. So who will have the influence, the reach and the means to influence when people want to watch that next episode? What happens when people choose to view something at a specific time rather than being forced to, and what might convince them to do that?

2. Embracing chaos – the end of sequential episodes

Later this year, Netflix will release all 14 episodes of the new series of much-loved cult comedy Arrested Development. It’s rumoured that each episode will concentrate on an individual character and will therefore stand alone, independent of the other 13 episodes. In other words: you don’t have to watch the episodes in any particular order. Brilliant.

This is the TV series reimagined as a jigsaw puzzle: flexible, malleable, interchangeable. A Rubix puzzle moving at a million pixels per frame. A choose-your-own adventure in sparkling high-definition. A televisual anagram waiting to be unlocked.

3. No more fireflies - an end to cowardice

The fact that Arrested Development is coming back at all speaks volumes about the opportunities that this development brings for experimentation.

How many series have we seen cancelled or scuppered over the years thanks to kneejerk reactions based on dodgy metrics, shallow focus groups, and press bullying? You can’t nervously eye the bottom line of a budget spreadsheet when there’s an entire series done and ready to ship. You can’t just bail out and hope no one notices. Instead you have to regroup, refocus, reboot and dig in for the longtail. Weirdly, short sharp blasts of television are set to create more perennial television. (Joss Whedon: all is forgiven.)

4. An end to multiplatform and the beginning of genuine convergence

Television has finally kneeled to the power of the internet. It’s no longer the aging dictator in the corner of the room, defiantly insisting on its superiority just because it’s been around for quite a while. Television is now no longer a channel, it’s just another medium, and as such it will have to learn to play nicely along with all the other mediums. Schedules, budgets, methods and practices will converge far quicker. When the whole experience is digital there is just a single platform that offers a multitude of front doors, routes through, and next steps.

When the whole experience is created seamlessly then it can be experienced seamlessly… and then something else will come along to disrupt everything all over again.

Posted
AuthorRob Hinchcliffe